The rules the rephraser is given

The system prompt below is the deployed one with two parts removed, and every sentence of it is a case. “A code never says texting” is there because Texas writes “electronic message” and Maryland “text message”, and a search for “texting while driving fine” reached the manual’s one-line ban and never the section whose subsection holds the fine: the texting fine was not shown in eighteen runs of eighteen across the two states. “Keep the kind of figure asked about but never a figure” is there because a search containing a number finds the laws containing that number, which is the model guessing the answer and then searching for its guess.

The fifth sentence changes the shape of a search. A question that asks what happens if needs two laws, not one: the duty, which is what the code says a driver must do, and the penalty or defence, which is what the code says follows. In Texas, what happens if I get pulled over without my license retrieved § 521.457, a different offence, and manual entries, and not one subsection of § 521.025, where the duty, the fine and the way out all live. Two searches, one for each half, put the section in reach, and Chapter 8 is about what happens once it is.

The two parts removed are a sentence and a block. The sentence follows the what-happens-if rule and says that not having your licence with you (“I don’t have it on me”, “no llevo mi licencia”) is the duty to have it in your possession and display it on demand, not driving without a licence, which is a different offence. It is there because the model read “I don’t have my license with me” as driving without a licence and searched for that offence, and Utah’s and Maryland’s duty to carry it never reached the pool. The block names the families of process question, and the In production section below is about it.